Candidate persona
A candidate persona is a research-based working profile of the people who might consider a role, built from conversations and past hiring data. It guides what you say and where you say it; it does not set the role's requirements.
Build a candidate persona from real hiring data
LinkedIn’s guide describes personas as research-based profiles: interview people who do the role well today, analyse the notes, and look for patterns. A small company can add what its own past hires show. Where did the people you hired come from? What did candidates ask in interviews? Why did they decline offers?
Summarise those findings rather than portraying one named individual. A made-up name and photograph can make assumptions look like evidence, so record the source of each field and mark what is still a hypothesis.
Template fields worth keeping
A template earns its place when each field prepares a decision about the job ad or the channel:
- Role and purpose: which role it covers and which question it should answer.
- The work as the candidate sees it: what they do day to day and which parts are new to them.
- Motivations: what makes this role interesting to them.
- Concerns and obstacles: what the ad would need to settle before they apply.
- Practical constraints: location, hours, pay range, progression.
- Where they look: the places they search for roles and for impressions of an employer.
- Evidence status: conversation, hiring data or assumption.
A field that changes no decision, such as favourite holiday destination, can go.
Keep the role criteria separate
The persona helps a team understand an audience; it does not define who qualifies. The job ad explains the work and requirements, and a scorecard records how evidence is assessed. OPM calls job analysis the foundation for assessment and selection decisions; it links tasks to the competencies they need, which is firmer ground for requirements than a guess about who might be interested.
Keep protected characteristics out of the persona
Great Britain. The Equality Act 2010 lists nine protected characteristics: age, disability, gender reassignment, marriage and civil partnership, pregnancy and maternity, race, religion or belief, sex and sexual orientation (section 4). An employer must not discriminate in the arrangements it makes for deciding to whom to offer employment, or by not offering someone the job (section 39(1)). GOV.UK says the Act applies to England, Scotland and Wales; Northern Ireland has its own guidance.
United States. Under federal law, a job ad must not show a preference for, or discourage applications because of, race, colour, religion, sex (including pregnancy, sexual orientation and transgender status), national origin, age (40 or older), disability or genetic information, and recruitment methods must not discriminate on those grounds either (EEOC). Title VII and the ADA cover employers with 15 or more employees, the age rules 20 or more, counting people who worked for the employer for at least 20 calendar weeks (EEOC). These are federal rules, so check any state requirements separately.
In practice, a persona that reads “late twenties, male” because the last hire fit that description will leak into ad wording and shortlisting. Describe situations instead, such as “moving over from a trade” or “needs predictable hours”.
Test whether the persona changes anything
Ask recent candidates and hiring stakeholders what drew them to the work, what was unclear and what mattered in their decision, then compare the answers with the actual tasks. If the persona cannot change the wording of the job ad or the choice of channel, it is probably too broad to guide a search.
Sources and references
- LinkedIn: Finding the right candidate
- OPM: Job analysis
- Equality Act 2010, section 4: The protected characteristics
- Equality Act 2010, section 39 (employment: discrimination by employers)
- GOV.UK: Equality Act 2010 guidance
- EEOC: Prohibited employment policies/practices
- EEOC: Coverage of business/private employers