Glossary: HR & Recruiting Definitions
Candidate satisfaction is a recruiting indicator that expresses how satisfied applicants are with their experience of a company’s application and selection process.
Table of contents
Candidate satisfaction describes the satisfaction of candidates who have applied for a job.
An even more straightforward way to remember it is this: Candidate satisfaction expresses how your candidates perceive your company’s candidate experience during the process from application to employment.
First and foremost, it is an interesting indicator because it allows you to draw conclusions about the quality of the application and selection process. If, for example, many applicants drop out of the application process, this would lead to a low satisfaction rate.
But even beyond that, there are some good reasons for measuring satisfaction:
Finding suitable talent for one’s own company is becoming more and more difficult—especially in times of the Great Resignation and now that the number of vacancies is constantly increasing while the number of available skilled workers continues to decrease.
Applicants are not always that patient, and so a hiring process nowadays has to be fast and, above all, smooth to convince talent to work with your company.
Here is an overview of the most important quality criteria for candidate satisfaction:
There is no set formula for determining candidate satisfaction. Instead, it is measured with the help of a scale, the Net Promoter Score (NPS). So how do you get the necessary values?
The data that is evaluated with the help of the candidate satisfaction scale comes from the candidates themselves and is therefore very reliable. The survey works as follows:
To collect data on candidate satisfaction, it’s advisable to use a questionnaire that asks about the candidate’s experience and, above all, their satisfaction. All stages of the hiring pipeline should be taken into account. This means in detail:
The experiences and impressions during and between each individual stage (submission, screening, interview, assessment, decision). But also the overall impression of the company’s recruitment process should be asked using a value scale of, for example, 1-10.
The questions can be answered either in the form of a complete questionnaire at the end or between the individual steps. This can be done orally or (better) in writing.
Important:
The shorter the assessment after the completion of an intermediate step, the more precise the information. Nevertheless, careful consideration should be given to when and how questions are asked so that candidates do not feel they are being spammed.
The candidate experience scores received can then be broken down by stage and also evaluated as an average score for the whole process.
It is worth taking a look at the individual intermediate steps. These can help companies identify potential for improvement.
Note: The information from candidates who were rejected or dropped out is particularly useful. Instead of fearing bad feedback, companies should see it as an opportunity for improvement and gratefully accept it.
This shows that a company really wants to improve and learn, and this in turn has a positive effect on the image of the company.
The average of the candidate experience ratings is the basis of the Net Promoter Score on candidate satisfaction. Generally, the more ratings a company can collect, the more accurate the result will be.
The average values received are then evaluated as follows to determine the Net Promoter Score:
Scores from 1-6 are considered “detractors”, meaning applicants who weren’t satisfied and would not recommend applying to a company.
Scores of 7-8 are considered “passives”, meaning applicants who were largely satisfied, but not satisfied enough to make a recommendation.
Scores of 9-10 are considered “promoters”, meaning applicants who were completely satisfied and would recommend applying to a company.
Then the percentage of detractors (1-6) and promoters (9-10) is determined, and the percentage of detractors is subtracted from that of promoters.
The result should always be above 0, which means that a company and its application process are recommended among talented candidates.
All that is missing now are a few examples of how companies can ensure higher candidate satisfaction.
We recommend the following measures:
Sometimes a company isn’t even aware that something is not running optimally. The current practices and processes around talent acquisition should therefore be regularly questioned and optimised.
On the one hand, it can be helpful to consult other key figures such as time to fill and channel effectiveness. On the other hand, our article on must-dos in the recruitment process, which we link to further below, provides many useful tips on how the recruitment process can be optimised.
As mentioned earlier, employer branding has a significant impact on the candidate experience and, respectively, on candidate satisfaction. And there’s no better place to present the employer brand than on the career site.
Companies that do not offer an appealing career page on their website should take action and do something about it. To do so, they can get inspiration from other companies—or from these four excellent career pages.
Companies that request a lot of data and documents should question whether they really need them. On the one hand, according to the GDPR, only absolutely necessary data may be collected anyway.
On the other hand, it’s also no longer relevant to request a classic cover letter, references, and certificates. Applications through e-mail or, worse, post are also slowly going out of fashion.
That’s why it’s essential to simplify the application process for more candidate satisfaction. For example, through device optimisation, an easy application form, and limiting the requested documents to only the most necessary (e.g., only a CV/resume).
If you want to go one step further and promote diversity in the team, you could also try so-called blind hiring.
Using an ATS tool combines some of these measures, and can thus significantly speed up the hiring process and considerably improve the candidate experience with little effort.
With JOIN’s ATS, you get everything you need to offer candidates a modern and positive candidate experience from a single source. Included are multilingual application forms, a dedicated careers page, automated email messages, user-friendly login without password, and easy in-app communication with candidates.
Free recruiting software that helps you hire faster
Find out for yourself how we help you attract, screen, and manage the best talent to grow your team.
Get started for freeRelated terms
Related articles
How to give feedback effectively
Giving feedback isn’t always easy. Do you know how best to give feedback to your manager? How about to your colleagues? Learn how to give feedback to anyone at work with these top tips.
The 5 candidate journey phases – from first contact to final decision
Find out how to optimise the 5 stages of the candidate journey to easily find, attract, and retain the best candidates for your business!
Helpful employee selection methods to hire better talent
Choosing the right employees for your business might sometimes feel as challenging as finding a needle in a haystack. However, equipped with the right employee selection methods and tools, the task need not be as daunting.